Webinar Events
Join us for a live webinar:
An Introduction to ScrumWorks Pro

Wed, Jan 7, 2009
10:00 AM - 11:00 AM PST
Sign up online »

Team members in Scrum

Thur, Jan 8, 2009
11:00 AM - 11:45 AM PST
Sign up online »

Default Site Image
Submitted by MichaelJames on August 12, 2008 - 6:05am.

[reposted from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/scrumdevelopment/message/31661 by mj]

Re: [scrumdevelopment] Per Person Burndown Poll Doesn't Make Sense

Hello, captwilco2002. On Monday, August 11, 2008, at 12:11:21 PM,
you wrote:

> 1. Why doesn't the poll make sense?

Because ...
... per person tracking is counter-productive;
... per person tracking does not collect useful data;
... burndown is measured in things done, not time spent;
... people don't burn things down, teams do.

> 2. Do you think I should be tracking this?

No. Not remotely.

> 3. About how many hours can be expected for an individual to burndown
> in one day (on average)? (Not what is a reasonable number of hours to
> expect each person to burndown on a daily basis, hence the purpose of
> my poll)

What is the difference between an average number that can be
expected, and a reasonable number to expect?

But never mind. Tracking individual hours of anything will break
Scrum, or any other process.

Ron Jeffries
www.XProgramming.com
I once had a coworker who worked so hard that when I came in the
morning, he was already sitting there trying to fix the things he
broke after I left the day before ... -- Ilja Preuss.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options

Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.